Notifications
Clear all

Beeman R1

15 Posts
5 Users
2 Likes
12.8 K Views
fenderguy
(@fenderguy)
Florida
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 61
Topic starter  

I have a line on a Beeman R1. Original owner. Collector mint condition. 1987 vintage 177 cal. What should I be paying for this R1 ? It is mint condition.


   
ReplyQuote
Avatar
(@jim_in_pgh)
Pennsylvania
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 1035
 

@fenderguy 

Personally I would pay $400-500 for a mint .177 R1, especially if its the long barrel one. But this powerplant can be a little overpowered in .177. In my opinion, the R1 was ideally suited to ,20, and just as good in .22. If I bought it, I'd look for a JM spring to tune it down to 12-13ftlb. These guns are wonderful in that power range.


   
ReplyQuote
fenderguy
(@fenderguy)
Florida
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 61
Topic starter  

there are 13 and 16 gr  JSB pellets in 177.  Wouldn't that be the same load on the powerplant  as shooting a JSB Exact 15.89 gr pellet in a 22 cal R1 ? 


   
ReplyQuote
Jeff_Marshall
(@jeff_marshall)
Indiana
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 23
 
Posted by: @fenderguy

there are 13 and 16 gr  JSB pellets in 177.  Wouldn't that be the same load on the powerplant  as shooting a JSB Exact 15.89 gr pellet in a 22 cal R1 ? 

No...a .22 pellet has a much larger base area for the compressed air to act against.

 


   
ReplyQuote
fenderguy
(@fenderguy)
Florida
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 61
Topic starter  

It could be argued that with similar weight pellets, the 177 would have a better ballistic coeefficient , leading to a flatter trajectory.


   
ReplyQuote
Gratewhitehuntr
(@gratewhitehuntr)
Florida
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 1882
 
Posted by: @fenderguy

It could be argued

You should read the link in Jeff's sig, before going any further with that train of thought.


   
ReplyQuote
fenderguy
(@fenderguy)
Florida
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 61
Topic starter  

ok - please send the link-- Mark


   
ReplyQuote

fenderguy
(@fenderguy)
Florida
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 61
Topic starter  

please send the link


   
ReplyQuote
Gratewhitehuntr
(@gratewhitehuntr)
Florida
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 1882
 

@fenderguy 

This link? Can you not see his sig line?

38 ways to win an argument using tricks, dodges and chicanery:
https://www.mnei.nl/schopenhauer/38-stratagems.htm

I love schopenhaurer as a philosopher, but I'd not like to debate him.


   
ReplyQuote
fenderguy
(@fenderguy)
Florida
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 61
Topic starter  

Wasn't expecting anything philosphical. When you mention "sig line" , I was thinking Sig Sauer .  But thank you for that anyway, will read it in depth later tonight. As far as airguns go, there are different schools of thought on many points. For example, a TX200HC has a 9.5" barrel , while the R1 has a 19.75" barrel. Of course , the longer length helps with the break barrel , but if 9.5" is more than adequate for accuracy in an airgun , why have it ? I am sure there will not be much arguement against a TX200HC being accurate. It had better be considering it cost $700+ .The shorter barrel also reduces lock time, theoretically improving accuracy when in the hands of a shooter vs mounted in a gun vise. I would think a heavier pellet in a 177 cal R1 would suffice. BTW- I have several TX200 mk3 and HC models tuned with a 12 lb  spring kit , and yes they are smoother and easier to shoot well than a stock TX. No question, I like like them better at 12 lb. I am sure you are correct when you state the R1 will be more enjoyable and easier to shoot well at 12-13lb.


   
ReplyQuote
Gratewhitehuntr
(@gratewhitehuntr)
Florida
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 1882
 

It'd make an interesting set of experiments to place a gun in a gimbal designed to allow pitching during firing, and examine accuracy with increasingly shorter barrel lengths.


   
ReplyQuote
fenderguy
(@fenderguy)
Florida
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 61
Topic starter  

Very interesting , indeed. Would love to see those results , GET THE HACKSAW !!! Recrowning would be a must have. one of my TX2OOHC is super accurate with the 9.5" barrel. They are all accurate for that matter. They should be, but they are really nice to shoot tuned to 12 lb. I do prefer the 12 lb rifle.Thank you for your replies - Mark Bello 


   
ReplyQuote
airmojo
(@airmojo)
Ohio
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 637
 

@fenderguy What is he asking for the mint R1 ? How bad do you want it ?

Here is a photo from the Blue Book of Airguns 13 Edition (most recent) that shows values.

Of course, I would want to see the stock, hopefully full length with nice wood !

 I would probably see if he'd take $500... they don't make them like that any more !

Blue Book of Airguns 13th Edition Beeman R1

   
ReplyQuote
fenderguy
(@fenderguy)
Florida
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 61
Topic starter  

thank you for the blue book page. We all want collector grade guns-- some guys just want to shoot, other guys want the collectibility. There is something special about having 35+ year old collectible in mint condition. 


   
airmojo reacted
ReplyQuote

airmojo
(@airmojo)
Ohio
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 637
 

@fenderguy I agree !
A local friend of mine offered me his Beeman R1 in .177 many years ago... his son was enjoying the new R9 that he bought him, and he knew I love airguns.

It was made in 1987 according to the serial number and Weihrauch website... really nice full length stock, and great condition.

I bought a Macarri .22 Piranha TK barrel for it, and installed JM's full power kit shortly after that, and some other bling !

One of my favorite rifles, and still shooting great !

It's always liked the old blue tin Eley Wasp 5.56mm .22 pellets (14.4 gr), shooting at about 754 fps (18.18 ft/lbs).

Beeman R1
Beeman R1 | JM Piranha TK barrel

   
ReplyQuote

Airgun Warriors